Acromial Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 7، شماره 5، آذر 2019، صفحه 397-401 اصل مقاله (889 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2019.36735.1970 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Christopher J. Lucasti1؛ Surena Namdari* 2 | ||
| 1Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Acromial stress fracture (ASF) is a unique complication of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that can have substantial influence on clinical results. The purpose of this review is to describe demographics, functional outcomes, and union rates for cases of RSA complicated by ASF. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to identify studies that reported results of RSA complicated by ASF. Searches were performed using PubMed and Scopus up to January 1, 2018. Five articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: ASF occurred in 61 (6.9%) of 874 RSA cases identified. 82% of patients who sustained an ASF were female. ASF cases were, on average, 7 years older than cases that were not complicated by ASF. While improved compared to their preoperative state, patients who sustained an ASF demonstrated significantly less improvement in pain, function, and ROM compared to RSA patients without ASF. Conclusion: Women and older patients appear to be at greater risk for an ASF after RSA. Though nonunion rates are high, fair outcomes can still be achieved in cases of ASF after RSA. Further study is needed to identify modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with the development of ASF. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Acromial؛ Reverse shoulder arthroplasty؛ RSA؛ Stress fracture | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Dubrow S, Streit JJ, Muh S, Shishani Y, Gobezie R. Acromial stress fractures: correlation with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and acromiohumeral distance. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):e1074-9. 2. Mayne IP, Bell SN, Wright W, Coghlan JA. Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(2):90-100. 3. Hattrup SJ. The influence of postoperative acromial and scapular spine fractures on the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(5):4. 4. Kennon JC, Lu C, McGee-Lawrence ME, Crosby LA. Scapula fracture incidence in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using screws above or below metaglene central cage: clinical and biomechanical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(6):1023-30. 5. Teusink MJ, Otto RJ, Cottrell BJ, Frankle MA. What is the effect of postoperative scapular fracture on outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(6):782-90. 6. Levy JC, Anderson C, Samson A. Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(15):e104. 7. Hamid N, Connor PM, Fleischli JF, D’Alessandro DF. Acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2011; 40(7):E125-9. 8. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(10):2359-81. 9. Nayak S, Greenspan SL. How can we improve osteoporosis care? A systematic review and metaanalysis of the efficacy of quality improvement strategies for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2018; 33(9):1585-94. 10. Steen BM, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Hussey MM, Cusick MC, Kumar AG, et al. Outcome and value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(9):1433-41. 11. Chalmers PN, Keener JD. Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(1):40-8. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 583 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 557 |
||