Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Hook Plate and Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Fixations in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 7، شماره 6، بهمن 2019، صفحه 545-550 اصل مقاله (751.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2019.35707.1943 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hassan Taleb1؛ Ahmadreza Afshar1؛ mohammad j. shariati1؛ Ali tabrizi* 2 | ||
| 1Department of Orthopedics, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran | ||
| 2Clinical Research Development Unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran Department of Orthopedics, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) fixation with hook plate (HP) and continuous loop double endobutton fixation (CLDE) in the treatment of acute ACJ dislocation. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on eight patients with HP and nine patients with CLDE fixations for acute ACJ dislocations. The subjects were evaluated by various criteria, including disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Shoulder Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results: The differences between the mean scores of the visual analog scale for pain, DASH, ASES, UCLA shoulder rating scale, and Shoulder Constant, and SST were statistically significant in favor of the CLDE group. Mean difference of CC distance was 8.6±0.9 mm in the HP group; however, it was 11.6±1.2 mm in the CLDE group. The operation time was shorter in the HP fixation, compared to that in the CLDE fixation (51±13.3 versus 105±9.7 min; PHP group. Conclusion: The CLDE fixation was reported with better clinical outcomes than HP fixation; however, it was a technically demanding procedure. The HP maintained the CC distance better than CLDE with a technically easy application. The HP requires a second surgery for the removal and development of subacromial erosion and osteoarthritis of the ACJ that can be regarded as major concerns. Level of evidence: III | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Acromioclavicular dislocation؛ Closed-loop؛ Double endobutton؛ Hook plate | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Teodoro RL, Nishimi AY, Pascarelli L, Bongiovanni RR, Velasco MA, Dobashi ET. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation using the endobutton. Acta Ortop Bras. 2017; 25(3):81-4. 2. Domos P, Sim F, Dunne M, White A. Current practice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations-National survey. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017; 25(2): 2309499017717868. 3. Rockwood CA Jr. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Williams GR, Young DC, editors. Rockwood & Green’s fractures in adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. 4. Struhl S, Wolfson TS. Continuous loop double endobutton reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(10): 2437-44. 5. Struhl S. Double endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Techniq Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 8(4):175-9. 6. Murena L, Vulcano E, Ratti C, Cecconello L, Rolla PR, Surace MF. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double flip button. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(12):1511-5. 7. Natera-Cisneros L, Sarasquete-Reiriz J, Escolà- Benet A, Rodriguez-Miralles J. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries treatment: arthroscopic non-rigid coracoclavicular fixation provides better quality of life outcomes than hook plate ORIF. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(1):31-9. 8. Arirachakaran A, Boonard M, Piyapittayanun P, Kanchanatawan W, Chaijenkij K, Prommahachai A, et al. Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017; 18(4):293-304. 9. Athar MS, Ashwood N, Arealis G, Hamlet M, Salt E. Acromioclavicular joint disruptions: A comparison of two surgical approaches ‘hook’ and ‘rope’. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26(1):2309499017749984. 10. Bin Abd Razak HR, Yeo EN, Yeo W, Lie TD. Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 28(5):869-75. 11. Cai L, Wang T, Lu D, Hu W, Hong J, Chen H. Comparison of the tight rope technique and clavicular hook plate for the treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. J Invest Surg.2017; 31(3):226-33. 12. Chen CH, Dong QR, Zhou RK, Zhen HQ, Jiao YJ. Effects of hook plate on shoulder function after treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7(9):2564-70. 13. De Baets T, Truijen J, Driesen R, Pittevils T. The treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation Tossy grade III with a clavicle hook plate. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004; 70(6):515-9. 14. Ding M, Ni J, Hu J, Song D. Rare complication of clavicular hook plate: clavicle fracture at the medial end of the plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(7):18-20. 15. Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Beck M. Results after AC joint repair with the hook plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(1):33-9. 16. Gao YS, Zhang YL, Ai ZS, Sun YQ, Zhang CQ, Zhang W. Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16(1):360. 17. Lu D, Wang T, Chen H, Sun LJ. A comparison of double Endobutton and triple Endobutton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(7):891-5. 18. Lim YW. Triple endobutton technique in acromioclavicular joint reduction and reconstruction. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008; 37(4):294-9. 19. Metzlaff S, Rosslenbroich S, Forkel PH, Schliemann B, Arshad H, Raschke M, et al. Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(6):1972-8. 20. Wei HF, Chen YF, Zeng BF, Zhang CQ, Chai YM, Wang HM, et al. Triple endobuttton technique for the treatment of acute complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations: preliminary results. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(4):555-9. 21. Yoon JP, Lee BJ, Nam SJ, Chung SW, Jeong WJ, Min WK, et al. Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015; 7(1):97-103. 22. Zhang L, Zhou X, Qi J, Zeng Y, Zhang S, Liu G, et al. Modified closed-loop double-endobutton technique for repair of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Exp Ther Med. 2018; 15(1):940-8. 23. Zhang J, Ying Z, Wang Y. surgery for acromioclavicular dislocation: factors affecting functional recovery. Am Surg. 2017; 83(12):1427-32. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 663 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 468 |
||