سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

shurche, sadegh, Yousefi sooteh, Mohammad. (1398). Fabrication of New 3D Phantom for the measurement of Geometric Distortion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging System. , 16(5), 377-384. doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2018.35346.1442
sadegh shurche; Mohammad Yousefi sooteh. "Fabrication of New 3D Phantom for the measurement of Geometric Distortion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging System". , 16, 5, 1398, 377-384. doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2018.35346.1442
shurche, sadegh, Yousefi sooteh, Mohammad. (1398). 'Fabrication of New 3D Phantom for the measurement of Geometric Distortion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging System', , 16(5), pp. 377-384. doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2018.35346.1442
shurche, sadegh, Yousefi sooteh, Mohammad. Fabrication of New 3D Phantom for the measurement of Geometric Distortion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging System. , 1398; 16(5): 377-384. doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2018.35346.1442

Fabrication of New 3D Phantom for the measurement of Geometric Distortion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
مقاله 11، دوره 16، شماره 5، آذر و دی 2019، صفحه 377-384    اصل مقاله (1.17 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijmp.2018.35346.1442
نویسندگان
sadegh shurche* 1؛ Mohammad Yousefi sooteh2
1Department of Physics and Medical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده
Introduction: Geometric distortion, an important parameter in neurology and oncology. The current study aimed to design and construct a new three-dimensional (3D) phantom using a 3D printer in order to measure geometric distortion and its 3D reproducibility.
Material and Methods: In this study, a new phantom containing 13,824 reference features (control points) was designed with AutoCAD software, fabricated with a 3D printer, and filled with vegetable oil. This phantom was tested on the Siemens 3 Tesla Prisma MRI model using a 64-channel head coil. Six-slice computed tomography (CT) scan images were used as a reference. Moreover, the reference features of MRI images were matched with those of CT scan images using a 3D reference model. The reproducibility of the phantom was investigated on three different days (three different imaging sessions per day).
Results: The obtained 3D results indicated that the non-uniformity of field and nonlinearity of the gradients and imaging reproducibility could lead to geometric distortion. The mean Euclidean distance error for MRI volume was less than 1 mm. The maximum Euclidean error was 1.5 mm. Distortion in the whole volume was pronounced more specifically at the edges of the magnetic field.
Conclusion: The results showed that the amount of distortion in the middle of the field was less than at its sides. This phantom can be used to check the distortion filters on the device. Furthermore, this phantom can be used to study geometric distortion in scenarios that require a small study volume, such as prostate studies.
کلیدواژه‌ها
MRI؛ Distortion؛ Phantom
مراجع

 

  1. Keller SS, Roberts N. Measurement of brain volume using MRI: software, techniques, choices and prerequisites. J Anthropol Sci. 2009;87:127-51.
  2. Oghabian MA, Faeghi F, Tohidnia MR. Effect of phase-encoding reduction on geometric distortion and BOLD signal changes in fMRI. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2012;9(4):275-81.
  3. Harvey H, Orton MR, Morgan VA, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Fisher C, et al. Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI. The British journal of radiology. 2017;90(1071):20160416.
  4. Fraass BA, McShan DL, Diaz RF, Ten Haken RK, Aisen A, Gebarski S, et al. Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into radiation therapy treatment planning: I. Technical considerations. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 1987;13(12):1897-908.
  5. Mallozzi R. Geometric Distortion in MRI. The Phantom Laboratory, Inc. 2015.
  6. Wang D, Doddrell DM, Cowin G. A novel phantom and method for comprehensive 3-dimensional measurement and correction of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2004; 22(4):529-42.
  7. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Medical physics. 1990; 17(2):287-95.
  8. Kawanaka A, Takagi M. Estimation of static magnetic field and gradient fields from NMR image. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments. 1986 ;19(10):871.
  9. Mizowaki T, Nagata Y, Okajima K, Kokubo M, Negoro Y, Araki N, et al. Reproducibility of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging based on phantom studies. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2000; 57(2):237-42.
  10. Ashkanmehr M, Riyahi Alam N, Oghabian MA, Ghasemzadeh A, Bakhtiary M, Ghanaati H, et al. Assessment of Reproducibility of Geometric Distortion in MRI using Phantom Measurements. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2005; 2(3):1-8.
  11. Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DM, Kemeny AA. A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(1):170-8.
  12. Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DM, Kemeny AA. Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):131-9.
  13. Yu C, Apuzzo ML, Zee CS, Petrovich Z. A phantom study of the geometric accuracy of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(5):1092-9.
  14. Sumanaweera T, Glover G, Song S, Adler J, Napel S. Quantifying MRI geometric distortion in tissue. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 1994 ;31(1):40-7.
  15. Baldwin LN, Wachowicz K, Thomas SD, Rivest R, Fallone BG. Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in MR images. Medical physics. 2007;34(2):388-99.
  16. Breeuwer MM, Holden M, Zylka W. Detection and correction of geometric distortion in 3D MR images. InMedical Imaging 2001: Image Processing. 2001 ;4322:1110-21.
  17. Mazaheri Y, Goldman DA, Di Paolo PL, Akin O, Hricak H. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy. Academic radiology. 2015;22(5):556-62.
  18. Shurche S, Alam NR. Investigating the geometric distortion in 3 tesla MRI images based on the phantom studies. Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies. 2017;4(1-2):42-8.
  19. Filippou V, Tsoumpas C. Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound. Medical physics. 2018 ;45(9):e740-60.
  20. Runge VM, Wood ML, Kaufman DM, Nelson KL, Traill MR. FLASH: clinical three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. RadioGraphics. 1988; 8(5):947-65.
  21. Tofts PS, Du Boulay EP. Towards quantitative measurements of relaxation times and other parameters in the brain. Neuroradiology. 1990; 32(5):407-15.
  22. Buxton RB, Edelman RR, Rosen BR, Wismer GL, Brady TJ. Contrast in rapid MR imaging: T1-and T2-weighted imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987 ;11(1):7-16.
  23. Elster AD. Gradient-echo MR imaging: techniques and acronyms. Radiology. 1993;186(1):1-8..
  24. Ernst RR, Anderson WA. Application of Fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1966 Jan;37(1):93-102.
  25. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD. FLASH imaging. Rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1986 Apr 1;67(2):258-66.
  26. Winkler ML, Ortendahl DA, Mills TC, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Kaufman L, Kramer DM. Characteristics of partial flip angle and gradient reversal MR imaging. Radiology. 1988 Jan;166(1):17-26.
  27. Gonzalez R. RE Woods Digital Image Processing using MATLAB. 2003;.
  28. Jafar M, Jafar Y, Dean C, Miquel M. Assessment of Geometric Distortion in Six Clinical Scanners Using a 3D-Printed Grid Phantom. Journal of Imaging. 2017 Sep;3(3):28.
  29. Briechle K, Hanebeck UD. Template matching using fast normalized cross correlation. InOptical Pattern Recognition XII 2001 Mar 20 (Vol. 4387, pp. 95-103). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  30. Crow FC. Summed-area tables for texture mapping. InACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics 1984; 18(3): 207-12.
  31. kroon DJ. Fast/Robust Template Matching - File Exchange. 2009. Available from:https://uk.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24925-fast-robust-template-matching?requestedDomain=www.mathworks.com.
  32. Doran SJ, Charles-Edwards L, Reinsberg SA, Leach MO. A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2005; 50(7):1343..
  33. Vincent L. Morphological Grayscale Reconstruction in Image Analysis: Applications and E cient Algorithms. IEEE transactions on image processing. 1993;2(2):176-201.
  34. Fransson A, Andreo P, Pötter R. Aspects of MR image distortions in radiotherapy treatment planning. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2001; 177(2):59-73.
  35. Walton L, Hampshire A, Vaughan P, Forster DM, Kemeny AA, Radatz MW. Distortion in magnetic resonance images obtained for stereotactic localization. Case report. Journal of neurosurgery. 2000;93:191-2.
  36. shurche S. Measurement of Radio Frequency Non-Homogeneity in MRI. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health. 2018 Mar 1;12(4):62-9..
  37. Orth RC, Sinha P, Madsen EL, Madsen EL, Frank G, Frank G, et al. Development of a unique phantom to assess the geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for stereotactic localization. Neurosurgery. 1999 Dec 1;45(6):1423-31.

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,177
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 384