The Use of Eponyms for Surgical Approaches and Fractures in Elbow Surgery: Accuracy and Reliability Pre- and Post-Training | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 7، شماره 2، خرداد و تیر 2019، صفحه 191-198 اصل مقاله (848.54 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: SHORT COMMUNICATION | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.32469.1860 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Jetske Viveen* 1؛ Matthijs P. Somford2؛ Koen L.M. Koenraadt3؛ Michel P. J. van den Bekerom4؛ Denise Eygendaal5؛ Inger B. Schipper6؛ Job N. Doornberg7 | ||
| 1Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands | ||
| 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands | ||
| 3Foundation for Orthopedic Research, Care & Education, Amphia Hospital, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands | ||
| 4Shoulder and elbow Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands | ||
| 5Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam-Zuidoost, The Netherlands | ||
| 6Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands | ||
| 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The use of eponymous terms in orthopedic trauma surgery is common. In an assessment pre-training versus posttraining at an AO Advanced Elbow Trauma Course, we aimed to report on (1) the accuracy and (2) reliability of 10 common eponymous terms used for surgical approaches and fractures in elbow surgery. Before training, eponyms were described correctly in 38% of questions versus 47% after training. The percentage of correct answers only improved significantly in one question (P<0.005). A generalized kappa of 0.37 before training versus 0.31 after training represents an overall fair reliability of the eponymous terms. In conclusion, the accuracy and reliability of eponymous terms used in elbow surgery is disappointing. Moreover, this type of standardized training format does not seem to improve the knowledge of eponymous terms of experienced trauma- and orthopedic surgeons. Therefore, we suggest considering descriptive terms or standardized fracture classifications instead of eponymous terms. Level of evidence: II | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Accuracy؛ Elbow؛ Eponyms؛ Fracture؛ Reliability؛ Surgical approach؛ Teaching | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Somford MP, Hoornenborg D, Wiegerinck JI, Bolder SB, Schreurs BW. Eponymous hip joint approaches. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136(7):1007-14. 2. Somford MP, Wiegerinck JI, Hoornenborg D, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D. Eponyms in elbow fracture surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(3):369-75. 3. Somford MP, Nieuwe Weme RA, Sierevelt I, Doornberg JN, Niek van Dijk C, Ring D, et al. The reliability of orthopaedic eponymous terms. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(13):e70. 4. Somford MP, Nieuwe Weme RA, van Dijk CN, FF IJ, Eygendaal D. Are eponyms used correctly or not? A literature review with a focus on shoulder and elbow surgery. Evid Based Med. 2016; 21(5):163-71. 5. Garfield E. What’s in a name? The eponymic route to immortality. Essays Inform Sci. 1983; 6(21):384-95. 6. Baskaran LN, Greco PJ, Kaelber DC. Case report medical eponyms: an applied clinical informatics opportunity. Appl Clin Inform. 2012; 3(3):349-55. 7. Fox RJ. Defending eponyms. Arch Neurol. 2006; 63(4):628. 8. Somford MP, de Visser E, Ijpma FF. The origins and current applications of classic eponymous terms for pelvic and acetabular fractures: a historic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82(4):802-9. 9. Waseem M, Khan M, Hussain N, Giannoudis PV, Fischer J, Smith RM. Eponyms: errors in clinical practice and scientific writing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005; 71(1):1-8. 10. Ravitch MM. Dupuytren’s invention of the Mikulicz enterotome with a note on eponyms. Perspect Biol Med. 1979; 22(2 Pt 1):170-84. 11. Smith RM. The classification of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(5):625-6. 12. Makhmalbaf H, Shahpari O. Medial collateral ligament injury; a new classification based on mri and clinical findings. A guide for patient selection and early surgical intervention. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018; 6(1):3-7. 13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-74. 14. Kocher ET, Stiles HJ. Textbook of operative surgery. London: Adam and Charles Black; 1895. 15. Kaplan EB. Surgical approach to the proximal end of the radius and its use in fractures of the head and neck of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1941; 23(1):86-92. 16. Henry AK. Complete exposure of the radius. Br J Surg. 1926; 13(51):506-8. 17. Boyd HB. Surgical exposure of the ulna and proximal third of the radius through one incision. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1940; 71(1):87-8. 18. Hotchkiss RN, Kasparyan NG. The medial ‘‘over the top’’ approach to the elbow. Tech Orthop. 2000; 15(2):105-12. 19. Monteggia GB. Lussazioni della ossa delle estremita superiori. 2nd ed. Milan: Instituzioni Chirurgisches; 1814. P. 131-3. 20. Galeazzi R. Di una particolare sindrome traumatica dello scheletro dell’avambraccio. Atti Mem Soc Lomb Chir. 1934; 2(12):663-6. 21. Essex-Lopresti P. Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dislocation; report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951; 33B(2):244-7. 22. Hahn NF. Fall von einer besonderen varietat der frakturen des ellenbogens. Zeitschrift Wundarzte Geburtshelfer. 1853; 6(1):185-9. 23. Steinthal D. Die isolierte fraktur der eminentia capitata im ellenbogengelenk. Zentralbl Chirurgie. 1898; 15(1):1. 24. Osborne G, Cotterill P. Recurrent dislocation of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966; 48(2):340-6. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 475 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 541 |
||