Short to Mid-term Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injury | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 7، شماره 4، مهر 2019، صفحه 346-353 اصل مقاله (1.38 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.32447.1858 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abolfazl BagheriFard1؛ Mahmoud Jabalameli1؛ Salman Ghaffari1؛ Jafar Rezazadeh1؛ Majid Abedi1؛ Masoud Mirkazemi2؛ Javad Aghamohamadi1؛ Afshin Hesabi1؛ Mehdi Mohammadpour* 1 | ||
| 1Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopedic injury leading to the tear of at least two of the major knee ligaments. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management of this debilitating condition. Regarding this, the present study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of single-stage multiligament reconstruction surgery in patients with MLKI. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 41 consecutive MLKI patients who underwent surgical reconstruction. Objective evaluation of the outcome included active extension and flexion. Furthermore, the subjective evaluation of the outcome was accomplished using the Lysholm scoring scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form in Persian. Postoperative complications were also recorded for all patients. Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.95±7.82 years. In addition, the mean follow-up period and the mean time interval between the injury and surgery were recorded as 36.9±17.8 and 11.5±8.9 months, respectively. The mean Lysholm and IKDC scores were obtained as 86.9±11.5 and 70±18.7, respectively. The mean Lysholm and IKDC scores were not statistically different between the patients who underwent surgery less than 6 months after the injury and those subjected to reconstruction 6 months postinjury (P=0.07 and P=0.3, respectively). Seven patients showed postoperative restricted range of motion, which was resolved with physiotherapy. The only surgical complication was popliteal artery injury. Conclusion: As the findings indicated, the single-stage reconstruction of MLKI provided an acceptable outcome. However, several aspects of this reconstruction, such as the timing of the surgery, still remain to be resolved in future investigations. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Complication؛ Multiligament knee injury؛ Outcome؛ Reconstruction surgery | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Riboh JC. Multiligament knee injuries. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2016. P. 359-67. 2. Levy BA, Dajani KA, Whelan DB, Stannard JP, Fanelli GC, Stuart MJ, et al. Decision making in the multiligamentinjured knee: an evidence-based systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(4):430-8. 3. Manske RC, Hosseinzadeh P, Giangarra CE. Multiple ligament knee injury: complications. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 3(4):226-33. 4. Moatshe G, Dornan GJ, Løken S, Ludvigsen TC, LaPrade RF, Engebretsen L. Demographics and injuries associated with knee dislocation: a prospective review of 303 patients. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(5):2325967117706521. 5. Pache S, Aman ZS, Kennedy M, Nakama GY, Moatshe G, Ziegler C, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament: current concepts review. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018; 6(1):8-18. 6. Jones RE, Smith EC, Bone GE. Vascular and orthopedic complications of knee dislocation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979; 149(4):554-8. 7. Rihn JA, Groff YJ, Cha PS, Harner CD. The acutely dislocated knee: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12(5):334-46. 8. Hoover NW. Injuries of the popliteal artery associated with fractures and dislocations. Surg Clin North Am. 1961; 41(4):1099-112. 9. James EW, Williams BT, LaPrade RF. Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(9):2644-57. 10. Barfield WR, Holmes RE, Slone H, Walton ZJ, Hartsock LA. Acute versus staged surgical intervention in multiligamentous knee injuries: a review of the literature since 2009. Curr Orthop Pract. 2015; 26(5):530-5. 11. Schenck RC Jr. The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect. 1994; 43(1):127-36. 12. Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Sohani SM, Mazaheri M, Goharpey S, Salavati M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Tegner and Marx activity rating scales in Iranian patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(22-23):2305-10. 13. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Makhmalbaf H, Golhasani-Keshtan F, Rabani S, Birjandinejad A. The international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective short form: a validity and reliability study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(11):3163-7. 14. Hadi H, Bagherifar A, Tayebi F, Ansari M, Shahsavaripour A, Qomashi I, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons has no deleterious effect on hip extension strength. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(3):278-83. 15. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterolateral ligament injuries: diagnosis, operative techniques, and clinical outcomes. Noyes’ knee disorders: surgery, rehabilitation, clinical outcomes. New York: Elsevier;2017. P. 527-77. 16. Moatshe G, Chahla J, LaPrade RF, Engebretsen L. Diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injury: state of the art. J ISAKOS. 2017; 2(3):152-61. 17. Peskun CJ, Whelan DB. Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of multiligament knee injuries: an evidence-based review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011; 19(2):167-73. 18. Stannard JP, Brown SL, Farris RC, McGwin G, Volgas DA. The posterolateral corner of the knee: repair versus reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(6):881-8. 19. Mariani PP, Santoriello P, Iannone S, Condello V, Adriani E. Comparison of surgical treatments for knee dislocation. Am J Knee Surg. 1999; 12(4):214-21. 20. Jari S, Shelbourne KD. Nonoperative or delayed surgical treatment of combined cruciate ligaments and medial side knee injuries. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2001; 9(3):185-92. 21. Karataglis D, Bisbinas I, Green MA, Learmonth DJ. Functional outcome following reconstruction in chronic multiple ligament deficient knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 14(9):843-7. 22. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Combined posterior cruciate ligament-posterolateral reconstructions with Achilles tendon allograft and biceps femoris tendon tenodesis: 2-to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(4):339-45. 23. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2-to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(7):703-14. 24. Shelbourne KD, Wilckens JH, Mollabashy A, DeCarlo M. Arthrofibrosis in acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the effect of timing of reconstruction and rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(4):332-6. 25. Shelbourne K, Baele J. Treatment of combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries. Am J Knee Surg. 1988; 1(1):56-8. 26. Mook WR, Miller MD, Diduch DR, Hertel J, Boachie- Adjei Y, Hart JM. Multiple-ligament knee injuries: a systematic review of the timing of operative intervention and postoperative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(12):2946-57. 27. Levy BA, Dajani KA, Whelan DB, Stannard JP, Fanelli GC, Stuart MJ, et al. Decision making in the multiligamentinjured knee: an evidence-based systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(4):430-8. 28. Skendzel JG, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM. Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42(3):234-42. 29. Fanelli GC, Orcutt DR, Edson CJ. The multiple-ligament injured knee: evaluation, treatment, and results. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(4):471-86. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 629 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 484 |
||