Diagnostic Value of Ischial Spine Sign in Patients with Acetabular Retroversion | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 7، شماره 2، خرداد و تیر 2019، صفحه 168-172 اصل مقاله (437.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.24942.1658 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohamad Qoreishy1؛ Hamid R.S. Hosseinzadeh* 2؛ Ali Keipourfard3؛ Arya Shoghli3 | ||
| 1Akhtar hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Rowan University, NJ, USA | ||
| 3Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Acetabular Retroversion (AR) is a hip disorder and one of the causes of pain in this area. Evaluation of positive Cross Over Sign (COS) on AP X-Rays of the hip is currently the best method of diagnosis of AR. Several studies have measured co-existence of Ischial Spine Sign (ISS) in patients with AR. In this study we evaluated the diagnostic value of ISS in confirmation of AR and compared it with the diagnostic value of COS. Methods: In this study, 4120 AP hip X-Rays from Akhtar Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, were studied. Based on radiologic criteria, 1180 X-Rays were considered as standards and evaluated for ISS, COS and PWS (Posterior Wall Sign). Data analysis was done for correlation between ISS and COS. Results: A total of 1180 out of 4120 X-Rays were considered as standard; among which, 86 were diagnosed with AR based on positive COS in presence of PWS. Both ISS and COS were positive concurrently in 69 X-Rays. ISS was positive in absence of COS in 11 X-rays. No significant difference in diagnostic value for diagnosis of acetabular retroversion was found between ISS and COS (P<0.05). Conclusion: According to our results, both ISS and COS signs can be employed for diagnosis of AR (acetabular retroversion). Considering the absence of a significant difference between these two signs in confirmation of AR, it can be perceived that the diagnostic value of ISS in confirmation of AR is equal to COS. Validation of the mentioned results requires further studies. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Acetabular retroversion؛ Crossover sign؛ Diagnostic value؛ Ischial spine sign | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(2):281-8. 2. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion: treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(2):278-86. 3. Eijer H, Myers SR, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(7):475-81. 4. Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(3):423-9. 5. Sierra RJ. The management of acetabular retroversion with reverse periacetabular osteotomy. Instr Course Lect. 2013; 62(1):305-13. 6. Banks KP, Grayson DE. Acetabular retroversion as a rare cause of chronic hip pain: recognition of the “figure-eight” sign. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36(Suppl 1):S108-11. 7. Domb BG, Watson JN, Gupta A. Acetabular retroversion. New York: Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery; 2014. P. 1-21. 8. Wenger DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 426(1):145-50. 9. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 417(1):263-9. 10. Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T. The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(2):372-9. 11. Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Seifert B, Turen CH. Prevalence of acetabular dome retroversion in a mixed race adult trauma patient population. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74(6):766-72. 12. Tannenbaum E, Kopydlowski N, Smith M, Bedi A, Sekiya JK. Gender and racial differences in focal and global acetabular version. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(2):373-6. 13. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Yamamoto T, Mawatari T, Motomura G, Matsushita A, et al. Acetabular retroversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(4):895-903. 14. Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, Martinez A, Beck M, Ganz R, et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: High validity of the “cross‐over‐sign”. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25(6):758-65. 15. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 2008; 466(3):677-83. 16. Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH, Kalberer F, et al. Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010; 76(2):166-73. 17. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(3):666-75. 18. Kakaty DK, Fischer AF, Hosalkar HS, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(3):769-74. 19. Kappe T, Kocak T, Neuerburg C, Lippacher S, Bieger R, Reichel H. Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(6):817-21. 20. Tannast M, Pfannebecker P, Schwab JM, Albers CE, Siebenrock KA, Büchler L. Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(12):3297-305. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 606 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 421 |
||