Effect of Blood Sampling Site on the Changes in the Physiological Indices of Preterm Infants: A Crossover Clinical Trial | ||
| Iranian Journal of Neonatology | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 9، شماره 3، آذر 2018، صفحه 42-48 اصل مقاله (919.74 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/ijn.2018.27487.1366 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Pourashoori1؛ Keyvan Mirnia2؛ Fatemeh Ghorbani3؛ Abdolrasoul Safaiyan4؛ Mohammad Ali Nematzadeh5؛ Mohammad Arshadi Bostanabad* 3 | ||
| 1Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran | ||
| 2Pediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Pediatric Nursing, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 4Road Traffic Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 5Nurse in Asadabadi Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Venipuncture is one of the most painful and common interventions in Neonatal ward. A preterm infant can not cope long-lasting physiologic stresses; therefore, the pain caused by blood sampling may change the infant’s physiologic responses to the stress. This present study aim is to investigated and compare physiologic changes (pulse rate and oxygen saturation) in two sites of blood sampling in preterm infants. Methods: This crossover clinical trial was performed on 105 preterm infants of 28-32 weeks’ gestational age in Tabriz Alzahra teaching hospital. Infants were selected through convenient sampling method and were allocated to two groups using doubleblock. In group 1(53 infants): the blood was first drawn from head veins and after a 24-hour interval, it was repeated at the back of the hand. In group 2 (52 infants): this procedure was implemented conversely.Infants' demographic variables and physiologic values(pulse rate and oxygen saturation) were measured in both sampling methods. The data were analyzed using SPSS.13, Paired t-test and Friedman test. P˂ 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: There was a significant difference between two groups considering infants’ age and various assessing timeswhen pulse rate changeswere investigated (Pv≤0.001);however, no significant difference was found regarding toblood sampling sites(head & back of the hand)).In addition, no significant difference was found in oxygen saturation changes in terms of age and blood sampling sites(head& back of the hand); however, these changes were significantly different in terms of different blood sampling times (PvTIME≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Pulse rate and oxygen saturation changingwas not significantly different in two methods of blood sampling from head veins and back of the hand veins in preterm infants; therefore, both sites can be used for drawing blood. During blood sampling in preterm infants of lower gestational age, the rate of pulse increased;however, the level of oxygen saturation decreased. As a result, since infants of lower gestational age are more vulnerable, drawing blood is required to be performed at the first attempt and no more attempts should be made | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Blood؛ Hand؛ Head؛ Infant؛ Physiologic؛ Venipuncture | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V, Poskitt KJ, Brant R, Vinall J, et al. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann Neurol. 2012; 71(3):385-96. 2. Verklan MT, Walden M. Core Curriculum for neonatal intensive care nursing-e-book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. 3. Kapellou O. Blood sampling in infants (reducing pain and morbidity). BMJ Clin Evid. 2011; 2011:313. 4. MacDonald MG, Ramasethu J, Rais-Bahrami K. Atlas of procedures in neonatology. Philadelpheia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. P. 84-8. 5. Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio A, et al. Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ. 2011; 183(7):E403-10. 6. Linda J. Van marter, Pryor CC. Management of pain and stress in the NICU. Manual of neonatal care. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. P. 703-15. 7. Lucas-Thompson R, Townsend EL, Gunnar MR, Georgieff MK, Guiang SF, Ciffuentes RF, et al. Developmental changes in the responses of preterm infants to a painful stressor. Infant Behav Dev. 2008; 31(4):614-23. 8. Hockenberry MJ, Wilson D, Rodgers CC. Wong's essentials of pediatric nursing-e-book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. P. 228-32. 9. Walden M, Carrier C. The ten commandments of pain assessment and management in preterm neonates. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009; 21(2):235-52. 10. de Jesus JA, Tristao RM, Storm H, da Rocha AF, Campos D Jr. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and skin conductance: a comparison study of acute pain in Brazilian newborns. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:1875-9. 11. Padhye NS, Williams AL, Khattak AZ, Lasky RE. Heart rate variability in response to pain stimulus in VLBW infants followed longitudinally during NICU stay. Dev Psychobiol. 2009; 51(8):638-49. 12. Reyhani T, Mohebi T, Boskabadi H, Gholami H. The effect of facilitated tucking during venipuncture on pain and physiological parameters in preterm infants. Evid Based Care. 2012; 2(2):47-56. 13. Fatemian S, Mamdouh N, Rouhani K, Ashk TT. Relation between blood sampling pain and heart rate of newborns at fatemieh hospital in hamedan. Facul Nurs Midwifery Quart. 2006; 16(52):48-55. 14. Valeri BO, Holsti L, Linhares MB. Neonatal pain and developmental outcomes in children born preterm: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2015; 31(4):355-62. 15. Kattwinkel J, Boyle RJ, Chisholm CA, Clarke SB. PCEP perinatal continuing education program: specialized newborn care. 2nd ed. New York: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012. 16. Solimano A, Ling E, O'Flaherty D. ACORN acute care of at-risk newborns: a resource and learning tool for health care professionals. Vancouver: ACORN Editorial Board; 2010. 17. Bartocci M, Bergqvist LL, Lagercrantz H, Anand KJ. Pain activates cortical areas in the preterm newborn brain. Pain. 2006; 122(1-2):109-17. 18. Evans JC, McCartney EM, Lawhon G, Galloway J. Longitudinal comparison of preterm pain responses to repeated heelsticks. Pediatr Nurs. 2005; 31(3):216-21. 19. Anand K, Aranda JV, Berde CB, Buckman S, Capparelli EV, Carlo WA, et al. Analgesia and anesthesia for neonates: study design and ethical issues. Clin Ther. 2005; 27(6):814-43. 20. Chimello JT, Gaspardo CM, Cugler TS, Martinez FE, Linhares MB. Pain reactivity and recovery in preterm neonates: latency, magnitude, and duration of behavioral responses. Early Hum Dev. 2009; 85(5):313-8. 21. Holsti L, Grunau RE, Whifield MF, Oberlander TF, Lindh V. Behavioral responses to pain are heightened after clustered care in preterm infants born between 30 and 32 weeks gestational age. Clin J Pain. 2006; 22(9):757-64. 22. Badr LK, Abdallah B, Hawari M, Sidani S, Kassar M, Nakad P, et al. Determinants of premature infant pain responses to heel sticks. Pediatr Nurs. 2010; 36(3):129-36. 23. Manuprakash SK, Varadarajshenoy KK. Comparison of pain response to heel prick and venepuncture in term babies. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2012; 3(3):80-4. 24. Mirzarahimi M, Mehrnoush N, Shahizadeh S, Samadi N, Amani F. Effect of non-nutritive sucking and leg massage on physiological and behavioral indicators of pain following heel blood sampling in term neonates. Int J Adv Nurs Stud. 2013; 2(2):74. 25. Shrestha M, Adhikari RK. Comparison of pain response to venepuncture versus heel lance blood sampling in term neonates. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2012; 32(2):99-104. 26. Schlueter MA, Johnson BB, Sudman DA, Wang LY, Namkung P, Heasley SV, et al. Blood sampling from scalp arteries in infants. Pediatrics. 1973; 51(1):120-2. 27. Peihua J, She Y, Zhang M. The exploration for blood sampling through children's scalp artery trocar retaining. J Nurses Train. 2002; 1:7. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 624 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 549 |
||