Different References for Valgus Cut Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 6، شماره 4، مهر 2018، صفحه 289-293 اصل مقاله (554.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.26736.1707 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamidreza Yazdi1؛ Ara Nazarian2؛ Jim Wu3؛ Arash Amiri1؛ Poopak Hafezi4؛ Margaret Babikian2؛ Amin Mohamadi2؛ Reza Pakdaman5؛ Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini* 6 | ||
| 1Department of knee Surgery, Firoozgar Hospital, Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies at BIDMC - Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| 3BIDMC, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| 4McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| 5Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| 6Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The valgus cut angle (VCA) of the distal femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is measured preoperatively on three-joint alignment radiographs. The anatomical axis of the femur can be described as the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur or as the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur, which may result in different angles in some cases. During TKA, the anatomical axis of the femur is determined by intramedullary femoral guides, which may follow the distal half or near full anatomical axis, based on the length of the femoral guide. The aim of this study was to compare using the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur versus the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur for measuring VCA, in normal and varus aligned femurs. We hypothesized that the VCA would be different based upon these two definitions of the anatomical axis of the femur. Methods: Full-length weight bearing radiographs were used to determine three-joint alignment in normal aligned (Lateral Distal Femoral Angle; LDFA = 87º ± 2º) and varus aligned (LDFA >89º) femurs. Full-length anatomical axismechanical axis angle (angle 1) and distal half anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 2) were measured in all subjects by two independent orthopedic surgeons using a DICOM viewer software (PACS). Angles 1 and 2 were compared in normal and varus aligned subjects to determine whether there was a significant difference. Results: Ninety-seven consecutive subjects with normally aligned femurs and 97 consecutive subjects with varus aligned femurs were included in this study. In normally aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.05° ± 0.76° and for angle 2 was 3.62° ± 1.19°, which were statistically different (P= 0.0001). In varus aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.42° ± 0.85° and for angle 2 was 4.23° ± 1.27°, which were also statistically different (P= 0.0047). Conclusion: The two different methods of outlining the anatomical axis of the femur lead to different results in both normal and varus-aligned femurs. This should be considered in determination of the valgus cut angle on preoperative radiographs and be adjusted according to the length of the intramedullary guide. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Anatomical axis؛ Preoperative planning؛ Total knee arthroplasty؛ Valgus cut angle | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(2):263-8. 2. Insall JN, Kelly M. The total condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 205(1):43-8. 3. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and loadbearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 255(1):215-27. 4. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(5):745-9. 5. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(5):709-14. 6. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 173(1):178-83. 7. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 299(1):153-6. 8. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(1):77-9. 9. Nagamine R, Kondo K, Ikemura S, Shiranita A, Nakashima S, Hara T, et al. Distal femoral cut perpendicular to the mechanical axis may induce varus instability in flexion in medial osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty: a pitfall of the navigation system. J Orthop Sci. 2004; 9(6):555-9. 10. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8(4):419-26. 11. Yousof Gomrokchi A, Yazdi H, Nazarian A, Hafezi P, Lechtig A, Hanna P, et al. Gentamycin in the irrigating solution to prevent joint infection after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018; 6(Supple 1):2. 12. Ehrlichman LK, Gonzalez TA, Macaulay AA, Ghorbanhoseini M, Kwon JY. Gravity reduction view: a radiographic technique for the evaluation and management of weber b fibula fractures. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017; 5(2):89-95. 13. Schoenmakers DAL, Feczko PZ, Boonen B, Schotanus MGM, Kort NP, Emans PJ. Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(11):3569-75. 14. Seo JG, Moon YW, Kim SM, Jo BC, Park SH. Easy identification of mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54(6):1505-10. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,146 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,824 |
||