Precontoured Locking Plate Treatment in Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures: Outcomes and Complications with a Minimun of 2- Years Follow up | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 2، خرداد و تیر 2019، صفحه 105-111 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.22677.1593 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Juan Martìn Patiño* ؛ Alejandro Felix Rullan Corna؛ Alejandro Emilio Michelini؛ Ignacio Abdon؛ Sandra Denise Hochbaum؛ Fernando Zicovich Wilson | ||
| Upper Extremity Unit Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hospital Militar Central, Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome and complications with a long term follow up (minimum of 2 years post-operative) in patients with mid-shaft clavicle fractures treated with precontoured locking plates. Methods: We included 41 patients. Goniometric measurement of shoulder range of motion (ROM) was performed, as well as functional evaluation using the rating scale shoulder of the University of California (UCLA), the Constant scale, score of disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and visual analog scale (VAS). Postoperative complications, implants removal rates and new x-rays were analized. Results: The mean postoperative follow-up was 41.5 (24; 69. SD 13.4) months. Mean shoulder anterior elevation was 168.5º (120; 180. SD 22.9). The average value obtained for abduction was 175.2° (150; 180. SD 27.8), as to internal and external rotations, these were not affected. DASH 1.27% (0%; 25%. SD 4.3), UCLA 33.6 points (20; 35. SD 3.5), Constant 90.5 points (50; 100. SD 11.2) and VAS was 0 in 34 patients (83%). Complications: mild residual pain (3), hypoesthesia of the infraclavicular area (2), and rupture (1) and loosening (1) of the implant. hardware removal due to intolerance (2 cases) and new osteosynthesis due to acute implant rupture (1 case). Conclusion: Our experience after a mean follow-up of 41.5 months with precontoured locking plates for the treatment of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures has shown good functional results, with low complication and reoperation rate. Level of evidence: IV | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Clavicle؛ Complications؛ Fractures؛ Hardware removal؛ Osteosynthesis؛ Outcomes؛ Plates | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Altamimi SA, McKee MD. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(Suppl 2):1-8. 2. Campochiaro G, Tsatsis C, Gazzotti G, Rebuzzi M, Catani F. Displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures: Surgical treatment with a pre-contoured angular stability plate. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96(Suppl):S21-6. 3. Cho CH, Song KS, Min BW, Bae KC, Lee KJ. Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures comparison between reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010; 2(3):154-9. 4. Ranalletta M, Rossi LA, Bongiovanni SL, Tanoira I, Piuzzi NS, Maignon G. Surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures with precontoured plates. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015; 24(7):1036-40. 5. Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 23(2):106-12. 6. Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; 155(1):7-20. 7. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 214(1):160-4. 8. Ellis G. Oxford outcomes. Oxford, UK: Institute for Work & Health; 2006. 9. Muller ME, Allgöwer M. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995. 10. Martetschläger F, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Management of clavicle nonunion and malunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(6):862-8. 11. Mckee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, Mckee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(8):675-84. 12. Wijdicks FJ, Van der Meijden OA, Millett PJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(5):617-25. 13. Millett PJ, Hurst JM, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Complications of clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(1):86-91. 14. Xu CP, Li X, Cui Z, Diao XC, Yu B. Should displaced midshaft clavicular fractures be treated surgically? A meta-analysis based on current evidence. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 23(6):621-9. 15. Xu J, Xu L, Xu W, Gu Y, Xu J. Operative versus nonoperative treatment in the management of midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(2):173-81. 16. Zhang Y, Xu J, Zhang C, Sun Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicular fractures using superior anatomic plating. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(1):7-12. 17. Hulsmans MH, Van Heijl M, Houwert RM, Timmers TK, Van Olden G, Verleisdonk EJ. Anteroinferior versus superior plating of clavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(3):448-54. 18. Melean PA, Zuniga A, Marsalli M, Fritis NA, Cook ER, Zilleruelo M, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(4):587-92. 19. Sohn HS, Kim WJ, Shon MS. Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(8):1577-84. 20. Jiang H, Qu W. Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures using a locking compression plate: comparison between mini-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and conventional open reduction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(6):666-71. 21. Zhang B, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015; 23(1):27. 22. Little KJ, Riches PE, Fazzi UG. Biomechanical analysis of locked and non-locked plate fixation of the clavicle. Injury. 2012; 43(6):921-5. 23. Moya E, Lamas C, Almenara M, Proubasta I. Surgical treatment of diaphyseal and comminuted fractures of the clavicle using a low profile anatomical plate. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2012; 56(2):127-31. 24. Ashman BD, Slobogean GP, Stone TB, Viskontas DG, Moola FO, Perey BH, et al. Reoperation following open reduction and plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Injury. 2014; 45(10):1549-53. 25. Fridberg M, Ban I, Issa Z, Krasheninnikoff M, Troelsen A. Locking plate osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures: complication and reoperation rates in one hundred and five consecutive cases. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(4):689-92. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 472 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 369 |
||