Clinical Outcome of Anatomical Transportal Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 6، شماره 2، خرداد 2018، صفحه 130-139 اصل مقاله (1.29 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.30073.1777 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Omid Shahpari1؛ Moslem FallahKezabi1؛ Hamid Hejrati Kalati1؛ Farshid Bagheri2؛ Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh* 1 | ||
1Orthopedic Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Ahmad-Abad Street Mashhad, Iran | ||
21Orthopedic Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Ahmad-Abad Street Mashhad, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
Background: Good clinical outcome and return to sport and daily functions after anatomical arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is goal standard in this surgery. but to date, there are different challenging issues between orthopedic surgeons regarding graft selection and surgical techniques. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent anatomical arthroscopic one bundle ACL reconstruction with quadruple hamstring tendon autograft from 2010 to 2016 in our orthopedic sport medicine center. Eighty-two eligible patients (82 knees) who had met our inclusion criteria were examined in terms of knee stability by clinical examinations and KT 2000 arthrometer and - also were evaluated regarding variables related to their health and knee status with a mean 48months follow-up. Results: Seventy-seven patients (93.9%) were male and the other 5 cases (6.1%) were female. The mean age was 33 ± 8.06 years old at the time of surgery and mean BMI amount was 26.81 ± 3.72. 78 patients (95%) returned to pre-injury sport activity level after ACL reconstruction and two patients (2.4%) had re-rupture. 63 patients (76.8%) had negative anterior drawer and 67patients (81.8%) negative lachman tests respectively. 10 patients (13%) were found to have positive pivot shift tests which was correlated with pain and a less KOOS scores with a significant difference (P= 0.03). 72 patients (87%) had negative tests in active and 70 (85.4%) had less than 3 mm side to side difference in manual testing by KT2000. Final KOOS score was 70.87 ± 19.76. Mean Lysholm score was 90 ± 4.77. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of this study was 85 ± 14.11. Patients who had concomitant partial meniscectomy had significantly lower IKDC scores (P<0.01).Mean kujala score was 79 ± 3.07. Conclusion: The use of quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft besides the most important part of the treatment which is the surgical technique would yield to excellent results in ACL reconstruction both subjectively and objectively. In addition, patient selection and surgeon’s experience should be considered in determining the treatment plan for the patients. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ACL؛ Allograft؛ Hamstring tendon؛ Reconstruction | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Voigt C, Schönaich M, Lill H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: state of the art. Eur J Trauma. 2006; 32(4):332-9. 2. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(10):1756-69. 3. Arnold JA, Coker TP, Heaton LM, Park JP, Harris WD. Natural history of anterior cruciate tears. Am J Sports Med. 1979; 7(6):305-13. 4. Feagin JA Jr, Curl WW. Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4(3):95-100. 5. Noyes FR, Matthews DS, Mooar PA, Grood ES. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: the results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65(2):163-74. 6. Caborn DN, Johnson BM. The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. A review. Clin Sports Med. 1993; 12(4):625-36. 7. Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J. Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-Year followup. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(5):740-8. 8. Fetto JF, Marshall JL. The natural history and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 147(1):29-38. 9. Sherman MF, Warren RF, Marshall JL, Savatsky GJ. A clinical and radiographical analysis of 127 anterior cruciate insufficient knees. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1988; 227:229-37. 10. Myklebust G, Maehlum S, Holm I, Bahr R. A prospective cohort study of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite Norwegian team handball. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998; 8(3):149-53. 11. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28(1):124-30. 12. Harilainen A, Sandelin J. A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices--Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix--randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(4):699-706. 13. Liu ZT, Zhang XL, Jiang Y, Zeng BF. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(1):45-9. 14. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(3):344-52. 15. Wallace MP, Howell SM, Hull ML. In vivo tensile behavior of a four-bundle hamstring graft as a replacement for the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 1997; 15(4):539-45. 16. Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(1):2-11. 17. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(7):791-803. 18. Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus fourstrand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015; 22(2):100-10. 19. Amis AA, Scammell BE. Biomechanics of intraarticular and extra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(5):812-7. 20. Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics: adult spine surgery e-book. 12th ed. Canada: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. P. 2138-42. 21. Li S, Su W, Zhao J, Xu Y, Bo Z, Ding X, et al. A metaanalysis of hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee. 2011; 18(5):287-93. 22. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Sabzevari S, Irarrázaval S, Chao T, Fu FH. Anatomical individualized ACL reconstruction. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2016; 4(4):291. 23. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The short form health survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(3):875-82. 24. Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Ebrahimian MR, Ebrahimi I, et al. Validation of a persian-version of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) in Iranians with knee injuries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16(10):1178-82. 25. Rahimi A, Norouzi A, Sohani SM. The validity and reliability of the persian version of the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) questionnaire in Iranian patients after acl and meniscal surgeries. J Rehabilit. 2013; 14(2):116-24. 26. Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Yazdi MJ, Sohani SM, Mazaheri M, Salavati M, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(26):2259-63. 27. Kazemi SM, Abbasian MR, Esmailijah AA, Zafari A, Shahrbabaki ZS, Keshavarz AH, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between different femoral tunnel positions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2017;5(6):419. 28. Charlton WP, Randolph DA Jr, Lemos S, Shields CL Jr. Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(4):518-21. 29. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29(3):272-9. 30. Cerulli G, Placella G, Sebastiani E, Tei MM, Speziali A, Manfreda F. ACL reconstruction: Choosing the graft. Joints. 2013; 1(1):18-24. 31. Genuario JW, Faucett SC, Boublik M, Schlegel TF. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 3 anterior cruciate ligament graft types: bone-patellar tendonbone autograft, hamstring autograft, and allograft. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(2):307-14. 32. Williams RJ 3rd, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86- A(2):225-32. 33. Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grontvedt T, Drogset JO. Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(3):576-83. 34. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendonbone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A(9):1503-13. 35. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D’Andria S, Zaccherotti G. Patellofemoral problems after intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 288(1):195-204. 36. Marder RA, Raskind JR, Carroll M. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(5):478-84. 37. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(3):629-34. 38. Peterson RK, Shelton WR, Bomboy AL. Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17(1):9-13. 39. Graf B, Uhr F. Complications of intra-articular anterior cruciate reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 1988; 7(4):835-48. 40. Robertson GA, Coleman SG, Keating JF. Knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the incidence and associated factors of knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2009; 16(4):245-7. 41. Rispoli DM, Sanders TG, Miller MD, Morrison WB. Magnetic resonance imaging at different time periods following hamstring harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17(1):2-8. 42. Wright RW, Fetzer GB. Bracing after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 455(1):162-8. 43. Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf EJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(8):1520-7. 44. Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K. Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10):2161-9. 45. Bourke HE, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Patterson V, Pinczewski LA. Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(9):1985-92. 46. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(8):1986-95. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 666 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 450 |