Ethical Issues in Technological Disaster: A Systematic Review of Literature | ||
| The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 4، مهر 2018، صفحه 269-276 اصل مقاله (415.75 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: RESEARCH PAPER | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.22025.1580 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Khaji* 1؛ Bagher Larijani2؛ Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi3؛ Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi4؛ Hamid Reza Khankeh5؛ Soheil Saadat6؛ Seyed Mahmoud Tabatabaei7؛ Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh8 | ||
| 1Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, AND Department of Medical Ethics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center/Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th floor, Shariati hospital, North Karegar Avenue, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran. | ||
| 4Cancer Research Center of the Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 5Department of Health in Emergency and Disaster, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. | ||
| 6Assistant Professor in Epidemiology. Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 7Medical Ethics and History of Medicinee Research Center, AND Department of Medical Ethics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 8Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Resalat Avenue, Urmia, Iran. Department of Public Health, Division of Social Medicine, KarolinskaInstitutet, Stockholm, Sweden. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Ethical issues in Technological disaster: A systematic review of literature Introduction: Industrialization could bring risk of Technological Disaster (TD) such as happened in Chernobyl, Bhopal and Fukushima crisis. little has been discussed about its related ethical issues. In this study, we aimed to investigate ethical issues have been stated for technological disasters. Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted on the main international literature databases including Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and ISI (Jan 1, 2000 to March 30, 2014). From 64 articles were eligible for investigation of ethical issues in Natural disaster, 6 was related to Technological Disaster. The articles were in English language. Result: Our result show that there are six articles discussing ethical issues during Technological disaster. All of them are related to nuclear crisis in Fukushima resulting from Japan tsunami 2011. These articles discussed mainly three ethical issues in providing medical care to victims of Technological Disasters as follow: 1- Duty of care 2- Mandatory evacuation and Resource Allocation. Conclusion: Victim health is the main factor for making decision and implementation of any programs during response to disasters. Mandatory Evacuation for reasons other than providing health to people (such as: maintain public order) and if bring health risk to people will be unjustified. Duty of health workers for providing care is based on General beneficence meanwhile it is necessary to provide facilities to protect them from dangers that treat them in the field. For act ethically, Health workers must have adequate preparedness for response to T-D meanwhile it is necessary to provide guidelines for individuals that participation in relief operation. It is necessary to discuss more about Technological Disaster Ethics especially in industrial countries and where there is especial industrial with potential of huge crises. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Medical Ethics؛ Technological-Disaster؛ Duty of care؛ mandatory Evacuation؛ Resource Allocation؛ Systematic review | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Smith E, Wasiak J, Sen A, Archer F, Burkle FM Jr. Three decades of disasters: a review of disaster-specific literature from 1977-2009. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009; 24(4):306-11. 2. Weisaeth L, Knudsen Ø Jr, Tønnessen A. Technological disasters, crisis management and leadership stress. J Hazard Mater. 2002; 93(1):33-45. 3. Euripidou E, Murray V. Public health impacts of floods and chemical contamination. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004; 26(4):376-83. 4. Kirigia JM, Sambo LG, Aldis W, Mwabu GM. The burden of natural and technological disaster-related mortality on gross domestic product (GDP) in the WHO African region. Afr J Health Sci. 2002; 9(3- 4):169-80. 5. Jargin SV. Chernobyl-related cancer and precancerous lesions: incidence increase vs. late diagnostics. Dose Response. 2014; 12(3):404-14. 6. Akabayashi A, Hayashi Y. Mandatory evacuation of residents during the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an ethical analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012; 34(3):348-51. 7. Sharma DC. Bhopal: 20 years on. Lancet. 2005; 365(9454):111-2. 8. Marples DR. Chernobyl. Encyclopedia of Russian History. Available at: URL: http://www.encyclopedia. com/places/commonwealth-independent-states-andbaltic- nations/cis-and-baltic-political-geography-17; 2004. 9. World Health Organization. Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident 20 years later a UN report provides definitive answers and ways to repair lives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 10. Bird WA, Little JB. A tale of two forests: addressing postnuclear radiation at Chernobyl and Fukushima. Environ Health Perspect. 2013; 121(3):A78-85. 11. Wicclair M, Barnard D. Introduction -- a modern version of an ancient question. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012; 21(3):391. 12. Narita M, Tokuda Y, Barnett P. Professionalism of physicians at a major teaching hospital during the Fukushima nuclear disaster. QJM. 2016; 109(7):447-8. 13. Akabayashi A. Must I stay? -- the obligations of physicians in proximity to the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012; 21(3):392-5. 14. Akabayashi A, Takimoto Y, Hayashi Y. Physician obligation to provide care during disasters: should physicians have been required to go to Fukushima? J Med Ethics. 2012; 38(11):697-8. 15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. 16. Caro JJ, DeRenzo EG, Coleman CN, Weinstock DM, Knebel AR. Resource allocation after a nuclear detonation incident: unaltered standards of ethical decision making. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011; 5(Suppl 1):S46-53. 17. Knebel AR, Coleman CN, Cliffer KD, Murrain-Hill P, McNally R, Oancea V, et al. Allocation of scarce resources after a nuclear detonation: setting the context. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011; 5(Suppl 1):S20-31. 18. Eyal N, Firth P; MGH Disaster Relief Ethics Group. Repeat triage in disaster relief: questions from haiti. PLoS Curr. 2012; 4:e4fbbdec6279ec. 19. Holt GR. A physician’s ethical responsibility to prepare for and respond to disasters and other catastrophic events. South Med J. 2013; 106(1):1-2. 20. Grimaldi ME. Ethical decisions in times of disaster: choices healthcare workers must make. J Trauma Nurs. 2007; 14(3):163-4. 21. Iserson KV, Heine CE, Larkin GL, Moskop JC, Baruch J, Aswegan AL. Fight or flight: the ethics of emergency physician disaster response. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51(4):345-53. 22. Morin K, Higginson D, Goldrich M; Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs American Medical Association. Physician obligation in disaster preparedness and response. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2006; 15(4):417-21. 23. Ozge Karadag C, Kerim Hakan A. Ethical dilemmas in disaster medicine. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012; 14(10):602-12. 24. Oakley J. Can self-preservation be virtuous in disaster situations? J Med Ethics. 2015; 41(5):364-5. 25. Yasumura S, Goto A, Yamazaki S, Reich MR. Excess mortality among relocated institutionalized elderly after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Public Health. 2013; 127(2):186-8. 26. Nomura S, Gilmour S, Tsubokura M, Yoneoka D, Sugimoto A, Oikawa T, et al. Mortality risk amongst nursing home residents evacuated after the Fukushima nuclear accident: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e60192. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,097 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 782 |
||