Denosumab in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor and Its Recurrence: A Systematic Review | ||
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 4، مهر 2018، صفحه 260-268 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22038/abjs.2018.25254.1665 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Khodamorad Jamshidi1؛ Mohamad Gharehdaghi2؛ Sami Sam Hajialiloo1؛ Masoud Mirkazemi1؛ Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan3؛ Azra Izanloo* 3 | ||
1Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran | ||
3Razavi Cancer Research Center, Razavi Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Recent studies suggest that Denosumab reduces tumor size, therefore, makes the surgery easier with lower morbidity. However, some studies have reported several complications for this drug. So, this systematic review was performed to determine the effectiveness and safety of Denosumab in reducing bone destructions activity of giant cell tumor and skeletal-related events (SRE) in affected patients with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and its recurrence. We explored studies in PubMed, and Cochrane Library. For this purpose, articles of various levels were retrieved until October 22, 2016. Two reviewers assessed the articles independently based on predefined criteria to extract the relevant data. Primary outcomes associated with skeletal-related event, overall survival, and secondary outcomes such as pain, quality of life and adverse events were evaluated and analyzed. The total population of this meta-analysis consisted of 686 patients. Of this population, 55% had primary GCTB and 45% had giant cell tumor recurrence, with 2% experiencing secondary recurrence. The results showed the effectiveness of Denosumab in reducing the tumor size due to inhibiting the Osteoclastogenesis. Denosumab didnot show any effect on reducing tumor recurrence, but, in cases where complete tumor surgery is not possible and tumor residuals may remain, Denosumab can be helpful. Also, the clinicians should consider the risk benefit of Denosumab. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Denosumab؛ Giant cell tumor of bone؛ Meta-analysis؛ Recurrence؛ Systematic review | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Klenke FM, Wenger DE, Inwards CY, Rose PS, Sim FH. Giant cell tumor of bone: risk factors for recurrence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(2):591-9. 2. Sobti A, Agrawal P, Agarwala S, Agarwal M. Giant cell tumor of bone-an overview. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016; 4(1):2-9. 3. Unni K. Giant cell tumor/malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone. Dahlin’s bone tumors: general aspects and data on 11,087 cases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. P. 263-89. 4. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL. Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone. Cancer. 2003; 97(10):2520-9. 5. Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S, Sudanese A. Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(1):106-14. 6. Li J, Zhu Y, Wei Y. Fibrosarcoma development 15 years after curettage and bone grafting of giant cell tumor of bone. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(5):e512-6. 7. Rock MG, Sim FH, Unni KK, Witrak GA, Frassica FJ, Schray MF, et al. Secondary malignant giant-cell tumor of bone. Clinicopathological assessment of nineteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(7):1073-9. 8. Briët JP, Becker SJ, Oosterhoff TC, Ring D. Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(1):19-21. 9. Chawla S, Henshaw R, Seeger L, Choy E, Blay JY, Ferrari S, et al. Safety and efficacy of Denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(9):901-8. 10. Thomas DM. RANKL, Denosumab, and giant cell tumor of bone. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012; 24(4):397-403. 11. Xu SF, Adams B, Yu XC, Xu M. Denosumab and giant cell tumour of bone: a review and future management considerations. Curr Oncol. 2013; 20(5):e442-7. 12. Mak IW, Evaniew N, Popovic S, Tozer R, Ghert M. A translational study of the neoplastic cells of giant cell tumor of bone following neoadjuvant Denosumab. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(15):e127. 13. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. 14. Thomas D, Henshaw R, Skubitz K, Chawla S, Staddon K, Blay JY, et al. Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(3):275-80. 15. Branstetter DG, Nelson SD, Manivel JC, Blay JY, Chawla S, Thomas DM, et al. Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(16):4415-24. 16. Martin-Broto J, Cleeland CS, Glare PA, Engellau J, Skubitz KM, et al. Effects of denosumab on pain and analgesic use in giant cell tumor of bone: interim results from a phase II study. Acta Oncol. 2014; 53(9):1173-9. 17. Ueda T, Morioka H, Nishida Y, Kakunaga S, Tsuchiya H, Matsumoto Y, et al. Objective tumor response to Denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone: a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(10):2149-54. 18. Girolami I, Mancini I, Simoni A, Baldi GG, Simi L, Campanacci D, et al. Denosumab treated giant cell tumour of bone: a morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of a series. J Clin Pathol. 2016; 69(3):240-7. 19. Rutkowski P, Ferrari S, Grimer RJ, Stalley PD, Dijkstra SP, Pienkowski A, et al. Surgical downstaging in an open-label phase II trial of denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22(9):2860-8. 20. Traub F, Singh J, Dickson BC, Leung S, Mohankumar R, Blackstein ME, et al. Efficacy of denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of the bone. Eur J Cancer. 2016; 59:1-12. 21. Rekhi B, Verma V, Gulia A, Nirmala A, Desai S, Juvekar SL, et al. Clinicopathological features of a series of 27 cases of post-denosumab treated giant cell tumors of bones: a single institutional experience at a tertiary cancer referral Centre, India. Pathol Oncol Res. 2017; 23(1):157-64. 22. Wojcik J, Rosenberg AE, Bredella MA, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Hornicek FJ, et al. Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone exhibits morphologic overlap with malignant giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40(1):72-80. 23. Michiyuki H, Takahiro T, Hitoshi Y, Osamu H, Kazuhiro T, Watanabe K, et al. Radiological and pathological characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone treated with Denosumab. Diagn Pathol. 2014, 9(1):111. 24. Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Vijay V. Salvage treatment’ of aggressive giant cell tumor of bones with denosumab. Cureus. 2015; 7(7):e291. 25. Karras NA, Polgreen LE, Ogilvie C, Manivel JC, Skubitz KM, Lipsitz E. Denosumab treatment of metastatic giant-cell tumor of bone in a 10-year-old girl. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(12):e200-2. 26. Stadler N, Fingernagel T, Hofstaetter SG, Trieb K. A recurrent giant cell tumor of bone treated with Denosumab. Clin Pract. 2015; 5(1):697. 27. Keisuke A, Yoshiyuki S, Tatsuya T, Kazuo K, Tsuyoshi S. Hell-like mineralized recurrent lesion in the popliteal region after treatment of giant cell tumor of the bone with Denosumab. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(12):1767-72. 28. Mak IW, Evaniew N, Popovic S, Tozer R, Ghert M. A translational study of the neoplastic cells of giant cell tumor of bone following neoadjuvant denosumab. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(15):e127. 29. Kajiwara D, Kamoda H, Yonemoto T, Iwata S, Ishii T, Tsukanishi T, et al. Denosumab for treatment of a recurrent cervical giant-cell tumor. Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(3):553-7. 30. Yamagishi T, Kawashima H, Ogose A, Sasaki T, Hotta T, Inagawa S, et al. Disappearance of giant cells and presence of newly formed bone in the pulmonary metastasis of a sacral giant‑cell tumor following Denosumab treatment: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2016; 11(1):243-6. 31. Watanabe N, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Tanizawa T, Gokita T, et al. Watanabe et al. Early evaluation of the therapeutic effect of Denosumab on tartrateresistant acid phosphatase 5b expression in a giant cell tumor of bone: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7(1):608. 32. Mattei TA, Ramos E, Rehman AA, Shaw A, Patel SR, Mendel E. Sustained long-term complete regression of a giant cell tumor of the spine after treatment with denosumab. Spine J. 2014; 14(7):e15-21. 33. Amit A, Larsen BT, Buadu LD, Dunn J, Crawford R, Jonathan D, et al. Denosumab chemotherapy for recurrent giant-cell tumor of bone: a case report of neoadjuvant use enabling complete surgical resection. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2013; 2013(4):496351. 34. Boyce BF, Xing L. Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegrin. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(Suppl 1):S1. 35. Yasko AW. Interferon therapy for vascular tumors of bone. Curr Opin Orthop. 2001; 12(6):514-8. 36. Miller G, Bettelli G, Fabbri N, Capanna R. Curettage of giant cell tumor of bone. Introduction—material and methods. Chir Organi Mov. 1990; 75(Suppl 1):203. 37. Chakarun CJ, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk GR Jr. Giant cell tumor of bone: review, mimics, and new developments in treatment. Radiographics. 2013; 33(1):197-211. 38. Tse LF, Wong KC, Kumta SM, Huang L, Chow TC, Griffith JF. Bisphosphonates reduce local recurrence in extremity giant cell tumor of bone: a case–control study. Bone. 2008; 42(1):68-73. 39. Huang L, Xu J, Wood DJ, Zheng MH. Gene expression of osteoprotegerin ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappaB in giant cell tumour of bone: possible involvement in tumour cell-induced osteoclast-like cell formation. Am J Pathol. 2000; 156(3):761-7. 40. Yang SP, Kim TW, Boland PJ, Farooki A. Retrospective review of atypical femoral fracture in metastatic bone disease patients receiving Denosumab therapy. Oncologist. 2017; 22(4):438-44. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 885 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 969 |